ALUMINIUM PARTS / QUOTATION
Before you compare aluminium part quotes by unit price
Imagine receiving two quotes for the same mounting plate. Both refer to the same drawing and quantity, but the scope lines differ.
Fictional example: 100 mounting plates, drawing AP-01 Rev D, specified material 6061-T6.
Supplier A
Machining
Remove material to form the partBlack anodising
Produce the specified black finishDimensional report
Record measured dimensionsSupplier B
Machining
Remove material to form the partBlack anodising
Produce the specified black finishDimensional report
Record measured dimensionsB needs finishing and the report arranged separately or added to its quote. A’s scope line does not establish when its reported dimensions are measured.
Before comparing prices, you would want Supplier B to include finishing and inspection in its offer. But can you place an order with A immediately? Even the phrase ‘dimensional report included’ leaves a question unanswered.
Who takes on the work missing from B’s quote?
If you need finished, black-anodised plates, B’s offer leaves work after machining. You could arrange anodising separately or ask B to manage it. With a separate finisher, someone on your side must also consider the arrangements, movement of parts and receipt of the finished batch.
Adding an anodising charge to B’s unit price may still leave the comparison incomplete. Inspection and packaging after treatment also affect how much work stays with the buyer. An offer covering the agreed finished-part delivery scope makes the difference from A easier to interpret.
A machining-only offer can be a reasonable choice if you already have finishing arrangements. The decision then includes both supplier charges and the coordination and checking your team will undertake.
When were the dimensions in A’s report measured?
A includes finishing and a dimensional report. What its short scope line does not tell you is whether those dimensions are measured after machining or on the finished, anodised part. The two reports establish different things.
Think about the holes and faces that locate the plate against its mating component. Protolabs’ CNC guide notes that hard anodising can affect close fits [1]. ‘Black anodised’ alone does not identify the treatment type or its dimensional effect. The required treatment and the condition of the holes and mating faces set the basis for finished-part inspection.
The useful question for A goes beyond whether a report is supplied: which features are measured, and after which operation? If the report covers the finished condition required by the drawing, the receiving team can check against that same basis.
- 01Machining-stage measurement
- Does the machined part meet the dimensional requirements at that stage?
- 02Finished-part measurement
- Does the part meet the required dimensions after specified finishing?
- 03Report coverage
- Which features and which measurement stage are recorded?
Schematic of the part and mating component, not a manufacturing drawing with dimensions or coating thickness.
Aligning accuracy changes what the price difference means
Even reports issued at the same stage are not equivalent if the dimensional requirements differ. Sending the same CAD model does not establish which drawing revision the quote follows or whether the supplier has taken exceptions to its tolerances.
Protolabs’ tolerance guide explains that tighter tolerances increase manufacturing, measurement and quality-assurance effort [2]. An offer covering the required functional dimensions has a different basis from one that substitutes standard tolerances for some features. Calling both ‘high precision’ hides the difference between an outer edge and an assembly-critical hole.
A price difference may prompt a useful design review. But purchasing should not relax a functional tolerance simply to match the cheaper offer. If engineering approves a revised drawing, ask both suppliers to quote that revision. A change to the comparison basis requires prices on that same basis.
The same applies to material alternatives. A quote for the specified alloy and temper should remain separate from an unapproved substitution. A proposed material or process change also calls for an engineering and quality review of the finishing requirements.
Bring both offers back to one comparison sheet
‘Is everything included?’ lets each supplier decide what ‘everything’ means. Questions tied to the required finished part make their answers easier to compare.
| Ask | Item | Question |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier A | Dimensional report | Which drawing features do you measure, and before or after finishing? Please identify the method and report contents. |
| Supplier B | Work after machining | Please quote specified finishing, finished-part inspection and the report. Identify separately charged work. |
| Both | Drawing and material basis | Are there exceptions or alternatives to AP-01 Rev D and specified 6061-T6? |
| Both | Cost and timing basis | What is included or separate for first-order charges, packaging and transport? What starts the lead time and where does delivery end? |
Cost and lead-time assumptions need the same clarification from both firms. Separating one-time setup or fixture charges from repeat-order costs lets you assess the first order and later purchases separately. The same number of lead-time days can also mean different things if one supplier starts counting after drawing approval and another after material becomes available.
Compare prices when you can explain what they cover
Once B has revised its scope and A has clarified the finished-part inspection, you can compare the cost of the required result. Identify what is already included in the unit price, then add separately charged first-order costs and charges to the same delivery point. Costs awaiting a reply remain unanswered on the sheet.
B may still be cheaper, or the difference may narrow once the extra work is included. Asking A to manage the whole scope may reduce your team’s coordination work. Before choosing, you should be able to explain what each price buys.
Comparing aluminium part quotes is more than identifying a difference in amounts. Looking at the work needed to complete the part reveals what sits behind the prices and which decisions remain before an order.
Use with your own quotes
Open supplier clarification text
Replace the example drawing and quantity; retain only questions relevant to the recipient.
Subject: Quote clarification — AP-01 Rev D, 100 parts Thank you for your quotation. Please clarify the following so we can assess the order conditions. 1. Dimensional report Which drawing features do you measure, and before or after finishing? Please identify the method and report contents. 2. Work after machining Please quote specified finishing, finished-part inspection and the report. Identify separately charged work. 3. Drawing and material basis Are there exceptions or alternatives to AP-01 Rev D and specified 6061-T6? 4. Cost and timing basis What is included or separate for first-order charges, packaging and transport? What starts the lead time and where does delivery end? Please also identify deviations from the drawing and any work excluded from the price. Thank you.
Sources
- Protolabs — Definitive Guide to CNC Machining
Hard anodising and close fits: Anodizing Looks Great, printed p.27. Not a calculation of dimensional change for the example part.
- Protolabs — Fine-Tuning Tolerances for CNC Machined Parts
Tolerances and manufacturing, measurement and quality-assurance effort. Supplier-specific capabilities are not universal tolerances.