Applications & guidesAbout HAMNewsDiscuss sourcing
  1. Home
  2. /Sourcing from Japan
  3. /Petroleum products from Japan: identify the product and application
  4. /Lubricant PDS and SDS: which question does each document answer?
← Petroleum products from Japan: identify the product and application

MANUFACTURING / JAPAN SOURCING

Lubricant PDS and SDS: which question does each document answer?

Use product data to examine the proposed lubricant and safety data to understand its handling information. Match both to the exact offer, then resolve equipment suitability and the agreed supply requirements.

Contents

  1. An SDS attachment does not finish the comparison
  2. Read the PDS as product information, with its qualifications
  3. Read the SDS for the safety information it provides
  4. Return the unanswered questions with the offer
  5. Resolve the equipment question, then retain the supply reference
  6. Questions to send your supplier

An SDS attachment does not finish the comparison

Imagine a buyer receiving two lubricant quotations. One includes a product data sheet; the other includes only a safety data sheet. Both attachments may be useful, but they do not answer the same question. Ask for the missing document before treating the offers as fully comparable.

First write down the manufacturer, full product name, grade and proposed supply reference. Match each attachment to that product, its intended market and its revision or issue date. Shell’s catalogue instructions distinguish technical and safety sheets and ask users to select country and language.[3] A translated title or a familiar brand family alone does not identify the offered grade.

Read the PDS as product information, with its qualifications

PDS means product data sheet; some manufacturers use technical data sheet, or TDS. Look for the stated application, characteristics, test conditions, units and any explicitly identified approvals or recommendations. Keep the wording attached to the claim rather than rewriting every mention of a specification as a formal equipment approval.

For example, Idemitsu’s published FS-ZD2 product sheet separates applications, typical properties and handling notes, and directs the reader to the relevant SDS.[1] Its properties and performance information carry qualifications. The example shows why a typical value should not silently become an agreed batch limit. Ask the supplier which values, tolerances and evidence will actually form the order requirements.

The sheet may help narrow a candidate, but a value at one stated condition does not answer every question about the equipment or duty. Keep the application and operating requirements alongside the comparison. If a required characteristic is absent, request the relevant evidence rather than treating the blank as a pass.

Read the SDS for the safety information it provides

Idemitsu describes SDS as information for safe product management and lists categories including hazards, physical and chemical properties, handling, storage and emergency measures.[2] Ask for the current document applicable to the offered product and destination, in the language needed by the receiving team. Have the responsible people use that document for the actual handling arrangements.

Physical-property information can appear in both types of sheet. Its presence in an SDS does not make that document a full performance comparison, a lot certificate or equipment approval. Keep each question with the evidence that can answer it.

Connect three different records to the same offered lubricant
Connect three different records to the same offered lubricant123
  1. 1Product data: characteristics and the scope of stated product claims
  2. 2Safety data: information for handling and product management
  3. 3Agreed supply: identify the product, requirements, delivery and records

The lines associate documents with one offer; they do not make the documents interchangeable. The supply record is an enquiry example, not an additional universal certificate.

Return the unanswered questions with the offer

Use the missing rows to shape a specific request. A buyer comparing a replacement should then use the related changeover guide for compatibility and the equipment decision.

What evidence is missing from the lubricant offer?
QuestionEvidence to requestKeep separate
Which product is this?Evidence to requestManufacturer, full name/grade, supply reference, market and document datesKeep separateA family name or a similar translated title
What product claims can we compare?Evidence to requestPDS/TDS, conditions, units and exact claim wordingKeep separateTypical properties and agreed supply limits
What handling information applies?Evidence to requestApplicable current SDS and the receiving team’s languageKeep separatePerformance ranking or approval for the machine
Can it be used in this equipment?Evidence to requestEquipment requirement and relevant supplier/technical responseKeep separateA data-sheet attachment and an accepted replacement
What will be delivered?Evidence to requestAgreed product, specification, quantity, packing and required recordsKeep separateGeneral catalogue information and a supplied-lot record

Resolve the equipment question, then retain the supply reference

Where seals or other materials are involved, Mobil’s FAQ directs users to the equipment or seal supplier for specific recommendations.[4] Send the exact proposed lubricant and conditions with that question. The existence of an SDS does not settle suitability, and this guide does not prescribe a changeover method.

Once the proposal is accepted, retain the product identification, agreed requirements and the documents used for the decision with the order. Ask the supplier to flag relevant changes rather than substituting a similarly named product without review. For a sourcing enquiry, send HAM the current and proposed product references, equipment requirement, destination and the questions that the supplied documents have left open.

Questions to send your supplier

Open supplier questions
Manufacturer, full product name/grade and offered supply reference:
Equipment, use and required performance/reference:
Destination and document language needed:
Please provide the applicable PDS/TDS and current SDS, with dates/revisions.
For each stated approval/recommendation, please identify its exact scope and evidence.
Which values are typical, and which requirements are agreed for supply?
Questions needing an equipment/seal supplier or technical response:
Quantity, packing, delivery point and required delivery records:
Differences from the evaluated offer and changes requiring review:
Save questions ↓

Sources

  1. Idemitsu — Lubricant product information: Daphne Dynadraw FS-ZD2

    Read PDF pages 1–2: applications, typical properties and the separate reference to the relevant SDS; document dated 2021-07-07. No numerical properties or suitability claims are carried into this guide. This is an example, not a current offer.

  2. Idemitsu — SDS download

    Read the purpose of SDS and the listed information categories. Used to distinguish safety information from a performance comparison; no destination-specific legal conclusion.

  3. Shell — Lubricant data centre

    Read catalogue instructions: product selection, country/language and technical versus safety data sheets. No claim that a different market sheet applies to an offered product.

  4. Mobil — Industrial products FAQ

    Read questions on PDS/SDS availability and seals/material compatibility. Supports asking the equipment or seal supplier about specific recommendations, not approving a lubricant change.

Tell us the product, destination and decisions still open. A sample or an incomplete specification can be a starting point.

Discuss your sourcing requirements

Browse manufacturing sectors

  • Petroleum products from Japan: identify the product and application →

Related guides

  • Same viscosity grade: can an industrial lubricant be replaced?
All sourcing guides →

Manufacturing in Japan

  • Applications & guides
  • Discuss my needs — free
  • Sourcing guides
  • How it works
  • For Japanese manufacturers

Company

  • About HAM
  • All HAM businesses
  • Our approach
  • News

Contact

  • Contact
  • Sourcing partnerships
  • Privacy Policy

HAM LLC.

Nagoya Office

5-12 Takehashicho, Nakamura-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 453-0016, JapanTHE WHITE OISE301

contact@h-a-m.info

© 2021–2026 HAM LLC.